Overview of Genetic and Genomic Research Related to Stingless Bees (Meliponini): An AI-Assisted Science Mapping and Structural Topic Modeling Analysis

Résumé fourni par la source

Background/Objectives: Stingless bees (tribe Meliponini) are the most species-rich group of eusocial bees and critical pollinators across tropical ecosystems. Over the past seven decades, a growing number of studies have addressed their genetics and genomics, but coverage of the tribe remains taxonomically and geographically uneven. Here, we present a systematic evidence map and bibliometric science-mapping synthesis of this literature. Methods: We searched Scopus and Web of Science, retained 410 peer-reviewed articles published between 1950 and 2026, and applied structural topic modeling (STM) to characterize the thematic, temporal, taxonomic, and biogeographic structure of the corpus. Results: STM with K = 10 topics identified ten research themes, ranging from classical marker-based genetics and cytogenetics to phylogenomics, mitochondrial genomics, microbiome, and functional genomics. The estimated prevalence of phylogenomics/taxonomy and mitogenomics increased most steeply in recent years, a publication pattern consistent with—although not proof of—a shift toward genome-scale comparative approaches. Topic prevalence differed across biogeographic regions and subtribes: Neotropical and Meliponina-dominated studies were concentrated in population genetics, cytogenetics, and gene expression, whereas Indo-Australasian and Hypotrigonina-associated studies showed higher relative representation of DNA barcoding, mitogenomics, and microbiome research. Taxonomic representation was strongly skewed toward a few genera, with Melipona alone accounting for 43% of the corpus and most lineages across the Meliponini phylogeny remaining poorly studied. Conclusions: The principal contribution is a reproducible quantitative map of publication patterns; proposed research and conservation priorities are evidence-informed interpretations rather than direct outputs of STM.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.