Spontaneous splenic rupture and uterine serosal bleeding at 26 Weeks in COL3A1-related vascular Ehlers–Danlos syndrome
Rattachement africain : cn, hk. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (vEDS) is a rare COL3A1-related disorder that predisposes pregnant patients to arterial and visceral rupture. We report a 35-year-old primigravida at 26 weeks who presented with abdominal pain, hemorrhagic shock, and a rapid hemoglobin decrease. CT showed splenic laceration with hemoperitoneum. Emergency laparoscopy was converted to laparotomy because of approximately 2,000 mL of hemoperitoneum and limited access. A 3 cm × 2 cm splenic laceration, friable perisplenic tissues, and diffuse uterine serosal petechiae and oozing without gross rupture were identified. Cesarean delivery was performed because of concern for impending uterine rupture and to facilitate hemorrhage control, followed by splenectomy. The patient survived; the neonate did not. Splenic histopathology showed hemorrhage without malignant or infectious infiltration. Targeted sequencing identified a heterozygous COL3A1 (NM_000090.4):c.1862G > A, p.(Gly621Glu) variant, supporting vEDS. In pregnant patients with unexplained visceral rupture or diffuse tissue bleeding, vEDS should be considered promptly. Early genetic diagnosis and rapid multidisciplinary surgical decision-making may be critical for maternal survival, followed by vascular surveillance, asplenia management, and individualized reproductive counseling.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Spontaneous splenic rupture and uterine serosal bleeding at 26 Weeks in COL3A1-related vascular Ehlers–Danlos syndrome
- Date Crossref
- 01/09/2026
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.