Aller au contenu principal
2026 article

Healing outcomes after placental membrane-based skin substitute allografts in multiple wound types in routine care: a retrospective case series from a prospective observational wound registry.

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
8Institutions déclarées
2Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : us, de. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND: Real-world data on cellular, acellular, and matrix-like products (CAMPs) remain limited, particularly in mixed-etiology cohorts. OBJECTIVE: To describe routine practice hard-to-heal wound healing outcomes among adults treated with placental membrane-based allografts. METHODS: This retrospective case series drew on a prospective observational wound registry. Eligible adults had at least 1 application of a placental-derived CAMP and 1 follow-up visit. One index wound per patient was selected for primary analyses; secondary summaries covered all wounds. The primary endpoint was complete closure by 12 weeks; secondary endpoints were time to closure, at least 50% area reduction at 4 weeks, and percentage area reduction (PAR) at 12 weeks among open wounds. RESULTS: The cohort included 44 patients with 60 CAMP-treated wounds; 75.0% of index wounds were lower extremity diabetic ulcers (LEDUs), and median baseline duration was 91 days. Closure by 12 weeks occurred in 17 of 44 index wounds (38.6%; 95% CI, 24.4%-54.5%) and 22 of 60 wounds (36.7%; 95% CI, 24.6%-50.1%). Median time to closure among healed wounds was 28 days. At 4 weeks, 52.3% of index and 56.7% of all wounds achieved at least 50% area reduction. Among open wounds at 12 weeks, median PAR was 48.8% (index) and 50.8% (all). In a complete-case subset, 22 of 26 wounds closed (84.6%; 95% CI, 65.1%-95.6%), interpreted cautiously because wounds without ascertainable 12-week status were excluded. CONCLUSIONS: Findings in this cohort, most with LEDUs and substantial comorbidity burden, provide pragmatic benchmarks for CAMP-treated wounds and support the need for larger, standardized comparative studies.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

La source scientifique ouverte est momentanément indisponible.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Wound Healing and TreatmentsCorneal Surgery and TreatmentsBreast Implant and Reconstruction

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.