Acoustic emissions-guided focused ultrasound for liquid biopsy in infiltrative gliomas: A multicentre, open-label, phase 1/2 trial
Résumé fourni par la source
To characterize acoustic emissions (AE)-based closed-loop control and dosing for transcranial microbubble-enhanced focused ultrasound (MB-FUS) blood-brain barrier opening (BBBO) performed in the infiltrative margins of high-grade gliomas. We analyzed MB-FUS BBBO treatments performed using a 1024-element hemispheric phased-array system (Exablate Neuro Model 4000 Type II). AE signals were captured via integrated passive cavitation detectors. Sonications used a 1%–10% duty cycle, 5 ms pulse length, and 1 Hz pulse repetition frequency per subsonication. BBBO was quantified as a percentage of new T1-weighted contrast enhancement (new T1c) within each target on post-treatment MRIs. Sono-liquid biopsy profiling was performed with paired blood draws obtained immediately before and within 1 h after MB-FUS, enabling analysis of post-to-pre changes in total plasma cfDNA and fragmentomic features. cfDNA levels were analyzed in 23 participants, and cfDNA fragmentomics in 19 patients. Post-to-pre ratios of cfDNA and fragment length ratio (FLR) were significantly associated with both progression-free and overall survival (cfDNA: HR 0.45 and 0.71; FLR: HR 1.62 and 3.40; all p < 0.01). Longitudinally, increasing post-to-pre biomarker trajectories were associated with early progression, whereas decreasing trajectories were associated with long-term survival; trajectory concordance was 76% for cfDNA (PFS/OS) and 90% for FLR with PFS.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Acoustic emissions-guided focused ultrasound for liquid biopsy in infiltrative gliomas: A multicentre, open-label, phase 1/2 trial
- Date Crossref
- 01/08/2026
- Éditeur
- Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.