Pharmacy students' reflections on a TED talk about difficult conversations
Résumé fourni par la source
Background: Educating health professions students in difficult conversations is necessary, and the expanding role of pharmacists necessitates this instruction for pharmacy students. Methods: This exploratory qualitative study was modelled after a similar project with undergraduate nursing students. Second- (P2) and third year (P3) pharmacy students were invited to participate. Students watched the TED talk “On Being Present, Not Perfect” about difficult conversations and answered two reflection questions prior to a required lab course session. Student comments were categorised by a priori themes. Results: Fifty-two of 236 total students (23%) agreed to participate in the study; 36 were P2s and 16 were P3s. The themes of Communication, Empathy, and Role Development were consistent across the two reflection questions. No additional themes were identified. Treating the patient as a person was noted across each of the themes. Limitations: This study was conducted at a single, private, faith-based institution; participation was voluntary; data were self-reported; and no objective measures of communication skills were used. Conclusion: The students reflected on TED Talk about difficult conversations and the importance of treating patients with respect as a person. The reflective component encouraged students to assimilate the content along with experiences from their professional work or personal life.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Pharmacy students' reflections on a TED talk about difficult conversations
- Date Crossref
- 25/08/2026
- Éditeur
- International Pharmaceutical Federation (FIP)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.