Prefrontal-limbic circuit modulation in anxiety disorders: Differential neural effects of psychotherapy versus pharmacotherapy revealed by ALE meta-analysis
Résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND: Anxiety disorders (ADs) involve dysregulation of prefrontal-limbic circuits, but the neural effects of psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy remain unclear. METHODS: We conducted an activation likelihood estimation (ALE) meta-analysis of task-based fMRI studies reporting pre- and post-treatment whole-brain coordinates in ADs. Separate analyses were performed for psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy. A random-effects synthesis assessed changes in primary anxiety symptoms where extractable data were available. RESULTS: 27 studies involving 561 patients were included. Psychotherapy was associated mainly with decreased activation in prefrontal and striatal regions, including the medial, middle, and inferior frontal gyri and caudate nucleus, whereas pharmacotherapy showed more focal decreases in the right uncus. Subgroup analyses suggested heterogeneity across therapies, diagnoses, and tasks. 9 independent active-treatment cohorts (179 participants) showed a large pooled symptom reduction (Hedges' g = 1.44, 95% CI 0.99-1.90; I² = 75.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy may engage partly distinct neural pathways in ADs, with broader prefrontal-striatal modulation after psychotherapy and more focal limbic effects after pharmacotherapy. Findings remain exploratory given the limited and heterogeneous evidence base.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Prefrontal-limbic circuit modulation in anxiety disorders: Differential neural effects of psychotherapy versus pharmacotherapy revealed by ALE meta-analysis
- Date Crossref
- 25/08/2026
- Éditeur
- Informa UK Limited
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.