Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 article

Assessment of bone metastases, skeletal-related events and bone-targeting agents in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma receiving first-line systemic therapy (Meet-URO 33 study sub-analysis)

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
45Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : it. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Introduction Bone metastases (BMs) in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) negatively affect survival, quality of life, and increase the risk of skeletal-related events (SREs). Evidence remains limited in the era of first-line immune-based combinations. Patients and methods Meet-URO 33 is an Italian multicenter observational retrospective–prospective study enrolling mRCC patients receiving first-line therapy. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), clinical characterization, incidence of SREs, and impact of bone-targeting agents (BTAs). Survival was analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method, log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model. Results A total of 1696 patients enrolled between 2021 and 2025 were included; 526 (31%) had BMs at metastatic diagnosis. Patients with BMs more frequently had poorer performance status and unfavorable IMDC risk. The presence of BMs was associated with significantly worse OS (median 26.9 vs 102.1 months; HR 0.53, p<0.001) and worse PFS (median 14.2 vs 19.4 months; HR 0.71, p<0.001), with OS and PFS varying according to first-line regimen. Worse OS persisted across IMDC risk classes and treatment types; PFS differences were not significant in favorable/intermediate IMDC risk groups and with TKI monotherapy. Neither anatomical site nor number of BMs significantly affected OS. SRE incidence in patients with BMs was 26.8%, more frequent with spinal, rib, or other-site involvement, and more common in BTA-treated patients (22.2% vs 13.7%, p = 0.03), likely reflecting selection bias. Conclusions BMs are confirmed a negative prognostic factor in mRCC involving persistent unmet clinical needs.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Assessment of bone metastases, skeletal-related events and bone-targeting agents in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma receiving first-line systemic therapy (Meet-URO 33 study sub-analysis)
Date Crossref
01/08/2026
Éditeur
Elsevier BV
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Management of metastatic bone diseaseBone health and treatmentsRenal cell carcinoma treatment

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.