Environmental Control Extends Beyond Quantum Dephasing in Exciton Energy Transfer

Le résumé fourni par la source

Excitation-energy transfer underpins the conversion of light into usable energy in photosynthetic organisms and serves as a paradigm for evolutionary optimized transport in open quantum systems. Although this process is often described as incoherent thermally assisted hopping, such descriptions become inadequate when electronic coupling, vibronic interactions and environmental fluctuations occur on comparable energy scales. Determining how the environment controls transport therefore remains a fundamental challenge. Here, we use temperature-dependent 2DES to investigate energy transfer in the photosynthetic antenna protein allophycocyanin over the range 10 - 296 K. The dominant $β\rightarrow α$ transfer step exhibits a pronounced non-monotonic temperature dependence: the transfer time decreases from 400 fs at 10 K to 200 fs near 30- 40 K before increasing again to 400 fs at 296 K. In contrast, the homogeneous optical dephasing time decreases monotonically across the same temperature range. To interpret these observations, we model APC as a vibronically coupled excitonic dimer interacting with a structured environment and solve the dynamics using hierarchical equations of motion. Conventional fixed-bath models, including Drude-Lorentz and explicit intermolecular-mode spectral densities, fail to reproduce the observed turnover. Quantitative agreement is obtained only when the low-frequency sector of the environmental spectral density is allowed to anharmonically evolve strongly with temperature, while the high-frequency bath remains essentially unchanged. More broadly, these findings demonstrate that transport efficiency is controlled not simply by the magnitude of environmental fluctuations, but by the distribution of environmental spectral weight across frequency space, providing new experimental constraints on theories of molecular transport in complex quantum environments.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.