Altitude and Geographic Sensitivity Characteristics of the AIRS Satellite Spectrometer and Drift Correction Using Methane (CH4) Data
Résumé fourni par la source
We analyzed AIRS CH4 volume mixing ratio (VMR) Standard L3 v6/v7 IR-Only Daily products and ground-based measurements from 16 stations of the Network for the Detection of Atmospheric Composition Change (NDACC) at 24 pressure levels from 1000 to 1 mbar. We assessed the dependence of maximum AIRS sensitivity on latitude. At high latitudes, the zone of maximum sensitivity is closer to the surface, at 700–500 mbar; in mid-latitudes, it is 500–250 mbar; and in tropical and subtropical regions, good initial agreement between satellite and ground-based data is observed at 400–200 mbar for both AIRS product versions. At the vast majority of pressure levels and all comparison sites, a unidirectional negative drift in the difference between satellite and ground-based measurements (i.e., discrepancy drift) was observed. Drift coefficients were calculated for each statistically supported pressure level. Two regions of maximum drift were identified: one in the lower atmosphere (925–850 mbar) and another near 50 mbar. The smallest drift was observed at 400–200 mbar. As the main result of the study, we developed and applied correction factors for all 23 AIRS v6 and v7 levels. Using these coefficients led to much better agreement between long-term methane trends from ground-based and satellite measurements and to higher correlation coefficients across all comparison sites.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Altitude and Geographic Sensitivity Characteristics of the AIRS Satellite Spectrometer and Drift Correction Using Methane (CH4) Data
- Date Crossref
- 25/08/2026
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.