Strong Forms of Sensitivity and Nonstandard Li–Yorke Chaos in Topological Dynamics
Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
This paper investigates strong forms of sensitivity and nonstandard Li–Yorke chaos. It first shows that cofinite [Formula: see text]-multi-sensitivity and thickly syndetic sensitivity are equivalent in three different types of systems, and addresses the inheritance of strong sensitivity in finite product systems. Criteria for the existence of [Formula: see text]-multi-[Formula: see text]-sensitivity are established, where [Formula: see text] is a vector and [Formula: see text] is a positive integer, and the two Lyapunov numbers associated with this property are shown to coincide in transitive systems. Moreover, it is shown that for dynamical systems with a specific type of sensitivity on a locally connected metric space, the corresponding [Formula: see text]-sensitivity is exhibited. Based on this result, it is proven that various sensitivity notions are equivalent on the closed interval [Formula: see text]. Regarding chaos, it is proven that a chain-mixing system with the limit shadowing property contains [Formula: see text]-Li–Yorke pairs for any [Formula: see text]. Furthermore, it is shown that the full shift system exhibits [Formula: see text]-Li–Yorke chaos for any [Formula: see text], and [Formula: see text]-Li–Yorke chaos is conjugacy-invariant. Finally, the relationship between standard and nonstandard Li–Yorke scrambled sets is explored through examples.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Strong Forms of Sensitivity and Nonstandard Li–Yorke Chaos in Topological Dynamics
- Date Crossref
- 25/08/2026
- Éditeur
- World Scientific Pub Co Pte Ltd
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.