Loss of SNORD104-guided rRNA methylation promotes early adaptation to crizotinib in lung adenocarcinoma
Rattachement africain : fr, us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract The ribosome, long considered an invariant actor of gene expression, recently emerged as a contributor to translational control through chemical modifications of ribosomal RNAs (rRNAs). These modifications are guided by small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs), which direct modifying enzymes to specific rRNA positions. Here, we report that lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) cells that are resistant to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) reshape both their translational program and rRNA 2’O-ribose methylation (2’Ome) profiles. EML4-ALK -positive LUAD cells that are resistant to crizotinib (ALK inhibitor) exhibit reduced global protein synthesis and a change in selective translation of mRNAs, encoding proteins previously linked to resistance. These cells show concomitant reduction in SNORD104 and 2’Ome at its associated 28S_Cm1327 position. Functional studies reveal that SNORD104 depletion abolishes 2’Ome at 28S_Cm1327 without affecting basal translation or cell viability, but enhances both under crizotinib exposure. Moreover, SNORD104 knockdown attenuates caspase activation and PARP cleavage during treatment, supporting reduced cell death. Altogether, our findings support a role for snoRNA-guided rRNA modification as a novel non-genomic mechanism in early adaptive responses to crizotinib therapy in LUAD.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Loss of SNORD104-guided rRNA methylation promotes early adaptation to crizotinib in lung adenocarcinoma
- Date Crossref
- 24/08/2026
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.