Tailoring HLA antibody monitoring post-transplantation
Rattachement africain : de. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) donor-specific antibodies (DSA) are among the most important determinants of late allograft loss after kidney transplantation. However, no uniform monitoring strategy has been validated in pediatric recipients. This educational review recommends that post-transplant HLA antibody monitoring in children should be tailored to the individual patient's immunological risk profile rather than applied as a fixed schedule. Pediatric recipients face a heterogeneous risk landscape due to prolonged allograft exposure, high age-specific risk of nonadherence during adolescence, and the influence of the chosen immunosuppressive regimen, which demands a differentiated approach. Drawing on current international consensus documents, multicenter registry data, and emerging pediatric cohort studies, this review examines the scientific basis of HLA antibody-mediated injury, the available diagnostic tools, and the supporting evidence for risk-adapted monitoring intervals, individualized trigger-based testing, and interpretation of test results as mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) in a clinical context. We give special attention to adolescence and nonadherence as high-risk categories warranting intensified surveillance. We aim to provide a practical framework for tailored personalized HLA antibody monitoring that is applicable in the daily care of pediatric kidney transplant recipients.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Tailoring HLA antibody monitoring post-transplantation
- Date Crossref
- 24/08/2026
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.