A Case of Dual Endocrinopathies Induced by Pembrolizumab Following Treatment for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Type 1 Diabetes and Hyperthyroidism/Autoimmune Thyroiditis
Résumé fourni par la source
Pembrolizumab, a programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) immune checkpoint inhibitor, is commonly used in the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma, offering improved survival and tumor response. However, it can rarely lead to immune-related adverse events (irAEs), some of which may be significant. We report a 62-year-old male with squamous cell carcinoma of the lung, a 40-pack-year smoking history, prediabetes, and coronary artery disease, who presented with polydipsia, polyuria, and weakness. He was diagnosed with sudden-onset diabetic ketoacidosis. Laboratory workup revealed negative glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD), IA-2, and islet cell antibodies, as well as an undetectable C-peptide level, consistent with immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced type 1 diabetes. Concurrently, the patient developed hyperthyroidism with positive thyroid peroxidase (TPO) antibodies, suggesting autoimmune thyroiditis. This case underscores the importance of baseline screening and ongoing monitoring for endocrine irAEs during immunotherapy. Clinicians should maintain a high index of suspicion, even in patients without prior autoimmune disorders. Early recognition, patient education, and coordinated multidisciplinary care are critical for reducing complications and improving outcomes.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- A Case of Dual Endocrinopathies Induced by Pembrolizumab Following Treatment for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Type 1 Diabetes and Hyperthyroidism/Autoimmune Thyroiditis
- Date Crossref
- 24/08/2026
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.