Pelagic food web realignment supports resilient larvae of Southern Bluefin Tuna in a warming ocean
Rattachement africain : us, es, au, it. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Many of the oceans' top predatory fishes at low to mid latitudes face an uncertain future as their vulnerable larvae deal with higher environmental temperature and reduced productivity associated with climate change. However, ocean ecosystem models that predict a general decline of zooplankton prey with warming and stratification hardly ever account for complexities in pelagic food webs that might make them resilient in providing food resources for larvae. We illustrate such complexities in comparing feeding interactions of larval Southern Bluefin Tuna (SBT) between two studies conducted 35 y apart in the same spawning region off northwest Australia. In the first (1987), SBT larvae fed and grew at low rates demonstrably limited by zooplankton prey. In the second (2022), feeding and growth were significantly higher despite substantially warmer conditions. The difference reflects a realignment in larval feeding preference from copepods to appendicularians, which allows a more direct and efficient energy transfer pathway from the microbially dominated food web base to higher-level consumers. These findings reset thinking on bluefin larvae feeding preferences, demonstrate high growth on an appendicularian diet up to 30 °C, and align with predictions of appendicularians being an environmentally selected zooplankton category in warming oligotrophic waters.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Pelagic food web realignment supports resilient larvae of Southern Bluefin Tuna in a warming ocean
- Date Crossref
- 24/08/2026
- Éditeur
- National Academy of Sciences
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.