Dietary sugar type determines the response to protein restriction in females, but not males
Résumé fourni par la source
Abstract Low protein (LP) diets improve metabolic health in rodents and humans. In rodents, LP diets are typically implemented by replacing protein with carbohydrates like sucrose or cornstarch, keeping diets isocaloric. However, humans can choose from many different types of carbohydrate, and how dietary carbohydrate quality – the precise composition of the dietary sugars – impacts the response to dietary protein remains largely unexplored. Here, mice were fed control (21% protein) or LP (7% protein) diets with four different carbohydrate sources: sucrose, a 1:1 glucose/fructose mixture, glucose, or fructose. While LP diets improved metabolic health across all groups in male mice, carbohydrate quality also significantly altered specific health outcomes, with fructose-fed mice having the lowest body weight and adiposity of all control diets. In female mice, responses to LP diets were influenced by carbohydrate quality, with certain sugars inducing a stronger metabolic response to LP diets than previously seen. Finally, in female APP/PS1 mice, a model of Alzheimer’s disease, we find that although LP diets reduce Aβ plaque burden irrespective of carbohydrate type, dietary sugar type does influence spatial memory. Together, these results demonstrate that while dietary protein is a critical determinant of metabolic and neurological health, carbohydrate quality influences these outcomes in a sex-specific manner.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Dietary sugar type determines the response to protein restriction in females, but not males
- Date Crossref
- 23/08/2026
- Éditeur
- openRxiv
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.