Cross-Scale Performance Evaluation of GPM IMERG V07 Precipitation Products in a Typical Mountainous Monsoon Region

Le résumé fourni par la source

Satellite precipitation products like GPM IMERG are crucial for hydrological modeling and disaster prevention; yet, their reliability in complex mountainous monsoon regions remains challenging. While the latest IMERG V07 introduces key upgrades, including a Climatological Calibration Algorithm (CCA), its cross-scale error propagation mechanisms and performance heterogeneity in complex underlying surfaces are poorly understood. This study evaluates the daily and monthly performance of IMERG V07 and V06 (Early, Late, and Final Runs) from 2014 to 2020 against 91 rain gauges in Guangxi, China—a typical mountainous monsoon region. The evaluation employs multiple statistical metrics and a multi-dimensional stratification approach based on elevation, precipitation intensity, and seasonality to quantify error propagation and climate-topography coupling effects. The results reveal that V07, particularly the Late Run, enhances daily precipitation detection capabilities, it significantly increases the proportion of systematic positive bias from 62.3 to 64.8% (V06) to 67.2–68.9% (V07). Consequently, upon temporal aggregation to the monthly scale, this systematic overestimation is severely amplified, leading to degraded performance, with the Final Run suffering the most substantial accuracy loss. Furthermore, retrieval accuracy is heavily constrained by surface heterogeneity, with systematic overestimation surging in areas where relatively dry (mean annual precipitation < 1300 mm) and complex terrain (elevation 100–500 m) coincide. The introduced CCA effectively improved dry season estimations but failed during wet season by introducing substantial positive biases. Ultimately, while V07 better captures short-term precipitation dynamics, its structural systematic biases compromise long-term cumulative reliability, highlighting the necessity for physics-based bias correction in hydrological applications and dynamic calibration in future algorithm upgrades.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.