Strategic Leadership Capabilities, Institutional Capacity and Conservation Performance at Kenya Wildlife Service

Résumé fourni par la source

Abstract: Strategic leadership capabilities are increasingly important for enhancing organizational effectiveness and sustainability in conservation institutions operating in dynamic and resource-constrained environments. Kenya Wildlife Service (KWS) continues to face challenges including poaching, habitat degradation, climate change, resource constraints, and human–wildlife conflicts, which undermine conservation performance. Despite growing research on leadership and organizational performance, limited empirical evidence exists on how strategic leadership capabilities influence conservation performance in wildlife conservation institutions, particularly when institutional capacity is considered as a moderating variable. This study examined the influence of strategic leadership capabilities on conservation performance at KWS and determined the moderating effect of institutional capacity. The study was anchored on Strategic Leadership Theory, Resource-Based View Theory, Dynamic Capabilities Theory, and Stakeholder Theory. It adopted a positivist research philosophy and a descriptive cross-sectional survey design. The target population comprised 1,500 management staff, conservation officers, departmental heads, and administrative personnel, from whom a sample of 316 respondents was selected through stratified random sampling. Primary data were collected using structured questionnaires whose validity and reliability were confirmed through pilot testing. Data were analyzed using SPSS Version 29 through descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation analysis, multiple regression analysis, and hierarchical moderated regression analysis. Findings revealed that strategic vision, environmental scanning and foresight, stakeholder engagement and collaboration, and organizational adaptability had positive and statistically significant influences on conservation performance. Strategic resource allocation dimension was found to be insignificant. Institutional capacity significantly moderated the relationships between strategic resource allocation and conservation performance and between organizational adaptability and conservation performance. However, its moderating effects on the relationships between strategic vision, environmental scanning and foresight, and stakeholder engagement and collaboration, respectively, and conservation performance were not statistically significant. The inclusion of the five interaction terms increased the model’s explanatory power, with R² rising from .667 to .688, representing an additional 2.1% of the variance in conservation performance (ΔR² = .021). The change in the model was statistically significant (F-change = 3.703, p = .003), indicating that the interaction terms collectively contributed significantly to explaining conservation performance. Thus, while institutional capacity demonstrated a significant overall moderating effect, this effect was not uniform across all dimensions of strategic leadership capabilities. Specifically, significant moderation was evident only for strategic resource allocation and organizational adaptability, whereas the interaction effects involving strategic vision, environmental scanning and foresight, and stakeholder engagement and collaboration were not statistically significant. The study therefore established that conservation performance depends on both effective strategic leadership capabilities and partly on adequate institutional capacity, including financial resources, competent personnel, technological capability, supportive policies, infrastructure, and inter-agency coordination. The study concludes that strengthening strategic leadership capabilities alongside institutional capacity is essential for improving wildlife protection, biodiversity conservation, ecosystem sustainability, and management of human–wildlife conflicts. The findings contribute to strategic management, conservation management, and environmental governance literature and provide practical guidance to policymakers, conservation managers, and development partners in designing strategies and policies that enhance conservation effectiveness and institutional resilience within Kenya’s wildlife conservation sector. They also underscore the importance of aligning leadership interventions with institutional resource capacity.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.