Physics-Augmented Meta-ANN for Cross-Alloy Surface Roughness Prediction in Laser-Polished LPBF Metals: A Proof-of-Concept Study
Rattachement africain : in. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Surface roughness remains a critical challenge in Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF), where laser polishing is often required to achieve the surface quality needed for functional applications. Conventional prediction approaches are frequently alloy-specific or empirical, which can limit their transferability across different materials. This study presents a compact physics-augmented Meta-ANN for predicting surface roughness after laser polishing of LPBF metals. The framework incorporates energy density (ED = P/v) and nonlinear terms as physically meaningful features to enhance the representation of laser–material interactions. The model is trained using a heterogeneous literature-derived dataset comprising 60 samples from four commonly used LPBF alloys: AlSi10Mg, Ti6Al4V, Inconel 718, and SS316L. The proposed model achieves encouraging predictive performance, with R² values above 0.96 across the evaluated datasets. Given the limited dataset size and heterogeneous data sources, the results are interpreted as preliminary proof-of-concept evidence rather than definitive validation of cross-alloy generalization. Nevertheless, the findings indicate that physics-augmented feature representation may improve data efficiency and provide a practical basis for developing more generalizable machine-learning approaches for laser-polished LPBF surfaces.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Physics-Augmented Meta-ANN for Cross-Alloy Surface Roughness Prediction in Laser-Polished LPBF Metals: A Proof-of-Concept Study
- Date Crossref
- 24/08/2026
- Éditeur
- Open Engineering Inc
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.