Building Back Better Under Siege: Housing Reconstruction and Built-Environment Improvement in Al-Qubba, Gaza City

Résumé fourni par la source

Post-conflict reconstruction under prolonged blockade and governance fragmentation has rarely been examined empirically at the neighborhood scale. This qualitative single-case study investigates housing reconstruction in Al-Qubba, Gaza City, following the near-total destruction of the 2014 conflict. A three-dimensional analytical framework- physical quality, community agency, governance, and structural constraints is applied through the cross-cutting lens of Gaza’s blockade ecology. Data were triangulated across semi-structured interviews (n = 25), GIS spatial analysis, Space Syntax assessment (DepthmapX), and institutional document review. On physical quality, reconstruction met the minimum Build Back Better (BBB) threshold: reinforced-concrete roofing replaced pre-war structures, streets were standardized to 10 m and over 75% were paved, while 94.7% of residents expressed satisfaction; however, Space Syntax analysis revealed that Global Integration recovered only to 1.07 against a pre-war baseline of 1.28, indicating functional recovery without spatial optimisation, and public space provision was entirely unrealised. Regarding community agency, the hybrid owner-driven model produced multi-stage participation in 14/20 households (70%), substantially exceeding agency-driven equivalents, with participation depth positively associated with satisfaction through a perceived legitimacy mechanism; however, neighborhood-scale collective participation was absent. On governance, GRM material delays averaged three to six months; approximately 6/20 households (32%) were undercompensated by donor floor-area caps; and only 8/20 respondents (40%) reported concurrence between official and self-assessed damage valuations. The findings characterize Al-Qubba as demonstrating incremental resilience-building rather than transformative regeneration, and contribute four theoretical constructs: a two-tier BBB for siege contexts; blockade ecology as a BBB modifier; incremental resilience under siege; and configurational BBB assessment. As a single qualitative case study, findings are analytically transferable to comparable constrained reconstruction contexts rather than statistically generalizable.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.