Stress-Testing Explainable Intrusion Detection in Agricultural IoT Networks against Noise and Evasion Attacks
Résumé fourni par la source
Agricultural Internet of Things networks operate under variable communication conditions and expose intrusion-detection systems to both environmental perturbations and deliberate evasion. This study presents a reproducible multi-seed stress-testing protocol for a CNN-IWHO-Lite-Random Forest intrusion-detection pipeline evaluated on CICIoT2023, Farm-Flow, and UNSW-NB15. Three independent model seeds were used, while Gaussian-noise and adversarial experiments included nested internal repetitions. Preprocessing, representation learning, latent-feature selection, calibration, and threshold optimization were restricted to mutually disjoint non-test partitions, and exact feature-vector overlaps were removed before evaluation. Clean F1-scores were 0.9953 ± 0.0001, 0.4724 ± 0.0131, and 0.7480 ± 0.0183 for CICIoT2023, Farm-Flow, and UNSW-NB15, respectively. At σ = 1.0, the corresponding F1-scores were 0.9940 ± 0.0002, 0.4118 ± 0.0013, and 0.6768 ± 0.0550. Conditional attack success rates at ε = 0.8 were 16.17% ± 22.66%, 13.58% ± 10.56%, and 98.43% ± 1.17%. TreeSHAP audits and complete false-positive and false-negative summaries were used to interpret selected latent dimensions and decision failures. The results show that robustness is strongly dataset- and seed-dependent: Farm-Flow is limited primarily by baseline false positives and noise sensitivity, whereas UNSW-NB15 is consistently vulnerable to the evaluated score-query evasion attack. These findings support deployment decisions based on explicit stress tests rather than nominal accuracy alone.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Stress-Testing Explainable Intrusion Detection in Agricultural IoT Networks against Noise and Evasion Attacks
- Date Crossref
- 01/01/2026
- Éditeur
- Scientific Research Publishing, Inc.
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.