Daratumumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone in transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: MAIA final survival analysis
Résumé fourni par la source
In previous analyses of MAIA, daratumumab plus lenalidomide/dexamethasone (D-Rd) significantly improved progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) versus lenalidomide/dexamethasone (Rd) in transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). We report results on long-term OS and subsequent antimyeloma therapies from the MAIA final analysis. A protocol amendment (July 20, 2021) led to a long-term extension of MAIA, during which patients were followed for OS. A total of 737 patients were randomized to D-Rd (n = 368) or Rd (n = 369). At a median follow-up of 89.3 months (range, 0.0-102.2; interquartile range, 85.3-93.0), median OS was 90.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 80.8-not estimable [NE]) with D-Rd versus 64.1 months (56.0-70.8) with Rd (hazard ratio [HR], 0.67; 95% CI, 0.55-0.82); estimated 7-year OS rates were 53.1% (95% CI, 47.8-58.2) and 39.3% (34.1-44.5), respectively. Median time to subsequent antimyeloma treatment was not reached (95% CI, 84.1-NE) for D-Rd versus 42.4 months (33.5-50.6) for Rd (HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.41-0.63; P < 0.0001). Death due to adverse events occurred in 84 patients (D-Rd, n = 44/364 [12%]; Rd, n = 40/365 [11%]). With >7 years of follow-up, D-Rd demonstrated a new benchmark for median OS (7.5 years) in transplant-ineligible NDMM, further supporting frontline D-Rd use to maximize survival.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Daratumumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone in transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: MAIA final survival analysis
- Date Crossref
- 24/08/2026
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.