The Standard Model as Theorem of GG-Theory: Its 28 Parameters as Observations of One Six-Dimensional Geometry

Le résumé fourni par la source

The Standard Model is the most successful theory ever built and the most unsatisfying: it predicts experiment to extraordinary precision, yet cannot say where its own numbers come from. Twenty-eight quantities — particle masses, force strengths, mixing angles — must be measured and written in by hand. This paper argues that those numbers are not free choices of nature but observations. Nothing in nature is ever truly isolated — not even a single particle — so the four-dimensional world we measure is a projection of a deeper six-dimensional one, fixed once and carrying no adjustable dials. Measurement is that projection in action, and the twenty-eight quantities are not dials set by hand but values it must return: where the textbook sees accidents, the geometry sees theorems. For fifty years they were treated as inputs; the claim here is that they were outputs all along. Some follow from the geometry outright; others once a single named step is supplied; the rest are marked honestly as still open, and the paper says which it has earned and which it has not. Crucially, nothing is tuned after the fact: because one short integer ledger must serve all twenty-eight at once, the result is forced, not fitted — propositions descending from a fixed constitution in the spirit of Euclid, not an expression picked from a free alphabet. If the argument holds, a deeper question becomes fair: why these values, why four forces, why every electron is identical? The paper reads all this as one statement of uniqueness — a world that is as it is not by luck, but because the geometry allows no other. Part of the GG-Theory program, a series of preprints developing a six-dimensional geometric framework and its consequences for particle physics, cosmology, and open-system dynamics. The complete series is available at https://preprints.arisaka-gg.org/

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.