Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 article

Diagnostic accuracy of a clinical score with a rapid diagnostic test for enteric fever in Nepal, Bangladesh and Cambodia

0Citations signalées — pas une note de qualité
12Institutions déclarées
7Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Résumé fourni par la source

Abstract Background Distinguishing enteric (typhoid and paratyphoid) fever from other causes of fever is challenging. The diagnostic accuracy of Typhoid Rapid Diagnostic Tests (RDT) are suboptimal but might improve if combined with a clinical score. We aimed to develop a clinical score, incorporating a point of care C-reactive protein (CRP) and Typhoid RDT, that could be used for febrile patients attending a health facility with limited laboratory capability, to identify those suitable for further investigations such as a blood culture, an empirical antimicrobial choice that covers enteric fever, or to rule out enteric fever as a likely diagnosis. Methods Overall, 1168 Bangladeshi, Cambodian and Nepali children and adults attending hospital with fever were randomly split (80:20) into derivation and validation cohorts. There were 208/1168 (18%) with blood-culture-confirmed enteric fever. In the derivation cohort we studied the association of symptoms, signs, CRP, laboratory results, and the Test-it ™ typhoid IgM RDT with blood culture confirmed enteric fever using logistic regression and developed several clinical scores. We determined the diagnostic accuracy of the clinical scores in the validation cohort. Results The Typhoid RDT had a sensitivity of 63% and specificity 73% in the validation cohort. A basic clinical score including fever ≥ 3 days, headache, abdominal pain, diarrhoea, absence of cough, and CRP ≥ 10 mg/L had a sensitivity of 80% and specificity 56%. Adding the Typhoid RDT result to the clinical score resulted in a sensitivity of 87%, a specificity of 58%, a PPV of 34%, and a NPV of 95%. Conclusions The diagnostic accuracy of a Typhoid RDT was only marginally improved by combining with a clinical score. Enteric fever was very unlikely with a negative clinical score.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Diagnostic accuracy of a clinical score with a rapid diagnostic test for enteric fever in Nepal, Bangladesh and Cambodia
Date Crossref
22/08/2026
Éditeur
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Sujets associés

Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiologyViral gastroenteritis research and epidemiologyFecal contamination and water quality

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Recherche à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé ; OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant requis, aucune donnée externe enregistrée en base. Sources et limites.