Polygenic Risk Modelling in Periodontitis: Insights From a Feasibility Study of 4243 European Cases and Current Limitations
Rattachement africain : de, es, nl, at. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Genetic susceptibility plays a particularly important role in early-onset (EO) and severe periodontitis (PD). The genetic risk remains largely unexplained because of limited sample sizes and heterogeneous phenotypes in genome-wide association studies (GWAS). This study investigates whether current GWAS data can be used to construct a polygenic score (PGS) capturing genetic susceptibility to severe PD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A PGS was developed in a three-step design, using a German EO-III/IV-C-PD GWAS (n = 692 cases, ≤ 35 years at diagnosis) as the base dataset, a Spanish EO-III/IV-C-PD GWAS (n = 441 cases) to optimise the score, and as validation a Dutch EO-III/IV-C-PD GWAS (n = 171 cases) and a German population-based GWAS with later-onset III/IV-PD (Studies of Health in Pomerania [SHIP], n = 2941 cases). RESULTS: = 0.2%, p = 0.18; AUC = 0.52; 95% CI: 0.48-0.57) or in the SHIP dataset (AUC = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.48-0.52). Case-control distributions overlapped substantially. Genetic correlation analyses revealed no strong overlap with other associated traits. CONCLUSIONS: Current PGS models have limited case-control discriminative ability for PD. Larger harmonised studies are needed to enhance genetic risk prediction and clarify pleiotropic relationships.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Polygenic Risk Modelling in Periodontitis: Insights From a Feasibility Study of 4243 European Cases and Current Limitations
- Date Crossref
- 21/08/2026
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.