High frequency of apomixis in subterranean islands challenges macro-climatic models of geographical parthenogenesis
Rattachement africain : cn, gb. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
SUMMARY The Geographical Parthenogenesis (GP) hypothesis traditionally links apomixis to high-latitude and alpine regions, driven by a combination of thermal stress, UV radiation, and pollination barriers. At the core of the GP hypothesis is Baker’s Law, which asserts the evolutionary advantage of autonomous reproduction during the colonization of isolated habitats, frequently linking this advantage to macro-climatic stress. By investigating reproductive modes in subtropical subterranean karst caves, we test the core assumption that macro-climatic stress is the primary driver of apomixis. Our results suggest that barriers to pollination drive a high frequency of apomixis independently of thermal stress or UV radiation. Furthermore, we find a complete phylogenetic turnover between high-elevation, open, apomict-rich habitats and mid-elevation cave environments. Taxonomic composition in these caves is dictated by pre-adaptations to deep shade combined with a lineage-specific predisposition for autonomous reproduction. We propose that the GP hypothesis may be overly influenced by habitat sampling bias. Broader, unbiased sampling could yield a more nuanced and predictive framework to explain variations in apomixis frequency, ultimately providing deeper insights into the role of asexual reproduction in evolution.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- High frequency of apomixis in subterranean islands challenges macro-climatic models of geographical parthenogenesis
- Date Crossref
- 22/08/2026
- Éditeur
- openRxiv
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.