Exploring the nasal microbiome–metabolite axis as a potential therapeutic target in Parkinson’s disease-associated olfactory dysfunction
Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Olfactory impairment is a common early non-motor feature of Parkinson's disease (PD), often preceding motor symptoms by several years. However, the biological mechanisms underlying PD-associated olfactory dysfunction remain poorly understood. This study investigated the relationship between nasal microbiota, metabolites, and olfactory function in PD and explored potential therapeutic targets. A total of 66 participants, including PD patients and healthy controls, were enrolled. Nasal samples were analyzed using 16S rRNA sequencing and metabolomic profiling by GC-MS. An MPTP-induced PD mouse model was used to evaluate the effects of cholic acid supplementation. PD patients exhibited distinct alterations in nasal microbial composition and metabolic profiles, which were associated with olfactory dysfunction severity. Cholic acid showed potential as a candidate biomarker for PD-associated olfactory impairment (AUC > 0.97). In MPTP mice, cholic acid improved olfactory performance and increased TH expression in the olfactory bulb and substantia nigra, but did not significantly improve motor deficits or striatal dopaminergic neuron loss. These findings suggest a potential association between nasal microbiota-associated metabolic alterations and olfactory dysfunction in PD.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Exploring the nasal microbiome–metabolite axis as a potential therapeutic target in Parkinson’s disease-associated olfactory dysfunction
- Date Crossref
- 22/08/2026
- Éditeur
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.