Frustrated smectic liquid crystal elastomers as multifunctional mechanical metamaterials
Rattachement africain : gb. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract Auxetics are materials that show a negative Poisson’s ratio, i.e. thickening when under tensile strain. The discovery of nematic liquid crystal elastomers (LCEs) as molecular auxetic materials was a paradigm-shift in the design of mechanical metamaterials as they are tuneable, transparent, scalable, non-porous and facile to fabricate. Here, we report that smectic LCEs extend known synthetic molecular auxetics to a second family. The LCEs are acrylate-based, lightly crosslinked ( ~ 8 mol%) and polymerised in the nematic phase of a precursor mixture. The resulting smectic-A LCEs exhibit correlation lengths of a few molecular lengths, suggesting layer frustration, which we confirm occurs via the mechanism predicted by de Gennes in 1975. Three of the LCEs described exhibit negative Poisson’s ratios at strains above ~40%, thereby marking the observation of auxetic behaviour in smectic LCEs. Shear oscillatory measurements on planar and homeotropic LCEs demonstrate highly anisotropic moduli, enabling elucidation of highly anisotropic adhesive properties, with differences as large as 20x suggested between geometries. Room temperature tack measurements reveal a 31% difference in adhesion between geometries. Furthermore, we find that in the homeotropic case, shear moduli are comparable in both nematic and smectic A LCEs, validating theoretical expectations for such systems.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Frustrated smectic liquid crystal elastomers as multifunctional mechanical metamaterials
- Date Crossref
- 11/09/2026
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.