Hector Galaxy Survey: Falling in Between - Infalling Galaxies in the Midst of the Abell 3667 Merger

Le résumé fourni par la source

Whether cluster mergers enhance ram pressure stripping (RPS) and accelerate member galaxy evolution remains an open question. Here, we investigate galaxy populations in the nearby merging cluster Abell 3667 ($z\simeq0.0553$) using spatially resolved data from the Hector Galaxy Survey. We define an RPS sample combining Hector-selected galaxies with ionised gas disturbances (e.g., asymmetric tails or truncated disks) and supplementary, optically identified jellyfish galaxies lacking Hector data. Most of the RPS sample ($\sim 71^{+10}_{-7}\%$; 20/28) lies within $R_{200}$, where the merger impact is greater. Most asymmetric galaxies ($\sim 73^{+14}_{-8}\%$; 11/15), especially those with extreme RPS signatures, are concentrated in the inner cluster ($R \lesssim 0.6\, R_{200}$), along the merger axis between two shock-tracing radio relics. These central asymmetric galaxies show two spatial and kinematic groups: one at the North-West (NW) subcluster, downstream of its radio relic in a region of high-velocity intracluster medium (ICM) bulk motion, with blueshifted line-of-sight velocities; and a mostly redshifted population near the main cluster (MC), which also shows a turbulent ICM. Despite their projected association with the MC core and NW substructure, both samples' velocities indicate they are not bound to them. Tail orientations give insight into orbital histories: NW tails point away from the cluster centre and often align with the merger axis, suggesting merger-driven stripping, while MC tails show neither pattern clearly. Tails are broadly westward, with MC tails tracing due west and NW tails shifted northwest, pointing to two distinct filamentary accretion events for the NW and MC populations. Together, our results indicate enhanced RPS in the heart of A3667, driven mainly by infalling galaxies accreted along nearby filaments interacting with the merger-driven turbulent environment.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.