Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 article

Long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of interlaminar coflex dynamic stabilization versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis: a comparative study with minimum 15-year follow-up

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
3Institutions déclarées
2Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : cn, gb. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

This study aimed to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of inter-laminar Coflex dynamic stabilization compared with posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) over a long-term follow-up period exceeding 15 years. A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 78 patients (36 in the Coflex group and 42 in the PLIF group) treated between January 2007 and December 2009. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS) for back and leg pain and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Radiographic evaluation included intervertebral foraminal height (IFH), intervertebral space height (ISH), and range of motion (ROM) at the operative and adjacent levels. Complications, symptomatic adjacent segment disease (ASD), and revision rates were documented. At the final follow-up, the Coflex group demonstrated significantly lower low back VAS, leg VAS, and ODI scores compared to the PLIF group ( P < 0.05). Coflex initially maintained higher IFH and ISH at 1 month postoperatively ( P < 0.05), these parameters gradually decreased over time, becoming significantly lower than the PLIF group at the final follow-up ( P < 0.05). The Coflex group successfully preserved ROM at the operative level. In contrast, the PLIF group exhibited significantly increased ROM at both proximal and distal adjacent segments at the final follow-up ( P < 0.05). The incidence of symptomatic ASD (5.6% vs 16.7%) and the revision rate (2.8% vs 11.9%) were significantly lower in the Coflex group than in the PLIF group ( P < 0.05). Inter-laminar Coflex dynamic stabilization provides superior long-term clinical relief and functional improvement compared to PLIF for LSS patients. The progressive reduction in IFH and ISH in the Coflex group represents a biomechanical adaptive change that does not compromise long-term pain relief. By preserving operative segment mobility and preventing compensatory hypermobility at adjacent levels, Coflex significantly reduces the long-term risk of symptomatic ASD and the need for revision surgery.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of interlaminar coflex dynamic stabilization versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis: a comparative study with minimum 15-year follow-up
Date Crossref
22/08/2026
Éditeur
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Où se fait cette recherche

  • Capital Medical University Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital pays non établi dans la notice
    Établissement de santé
  • Spinal Research pays non établi dans la notice
    Organisation à but non lucratif

Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital — Capital Medical University et Spinal Research.

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Spine and Intervertebral Disc PathologyCervical and Thoracic MyelopathyMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.