Rapid magnetic bead nucleic acid extraction enhances influenza RT-qPCR sensitivity and subtyping success

Le résumé fourni par la source

Nucleic acid extraction remains the principal infrastructure barrier to molecular influenza testing outside centralised laboratories, since bead-based purification is normally tied to mains-powered extractors and trained operators. We evaluated SmartLid, a centrifugation-free format in which a removable magnetic key shuttles paramagnetic beads through pre-aliquoted lysis/binding, wash, and elution buffers without pipetting or powered instrumentation, against an automated magnetic-bead extractor (Nextractor NX-48S) on 311 nasopharyngeal specimens from the 2024-2025 influenza season at a National Influenza Centre. Paired eluates were amplified under identical monoplex RT-qPCR conditions for influenza A(H1N1)pdm09, A(H3), and B/Victoria. Both methods gave 100% specificity (47/47 negatives; no false positives). Subtyping succeeded in 263/264 reference-positive specimens after SmartLid extraction versus 241/264 after automated extraction (99.62% versus 91.29%; difference 8.33 percentage points; discordant pairs 23 versus 1; McNemar P < 0.001). Across 240 complete pairs, cycle threshold (Ct) values were lower after SmartLid extraction (median paired difference -2.78 cycles; estimated location shift -2.60 cycles, 95% CI -2.82 to -2.37; P < 0.001) with rank-ordering of specimens conserved between methods (Spearman rho = 0.84). The advantage was preserved across all three subtypes and in both fresh and frozen specimens (adjusted P < 0.001). Specimens recovered only after SmartLid extraction had higher Ct values than dual-detected specimens (median 34.37 versus 28.54; P < 0.001), locating the gain near the assay detection limit. An instrument-free manual format can therefore exceed the extraction efficiency of an automated reference workflow, extending quality-assured influenza subtyping beyond centralised laboratories.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.