Diversity of Ionized Gas Structures in Nearby Metal-poor Dwarf Galaxies
Le résumé fourni par la source
We investigate whether optical and far-infrared [O III] emission from nearby metal-poor dwarf galaxies can be represented by a homogeneous one-zone ionized-gas model with a single electron temperature and density. Our sample comprises five galaxies from the Herschel Dwarf Galaxy Survey: HS1222+3741, SBS0335-052E, POX186, Haro11, and IZw18. We combine galaxy-integrated or nearly galaxy-integrated [O III] 4363 and 5007 measurements from Seimei/KOOLS-IFU observations and published or archival spectroscopy with Herschel/PACS [O III] 88um measurements. Because [O III] 4363 is not detected in HS1222+3741, the analysis is based on the remaining four galaxies. SBS0335-052E and Haro11 lie near or slightly beyond the low-density boundary of the one-zone diagnostic. Their nominal line ratios favor effective densities of ne<1cm-3, while conservative treatment of the uncertainties allows values up to 40 and 10cm-3, respectively. These remain substantially below densities inferred from independent diagnostics. By contrast, POX186 and IZw18 show no significant discrepancy between the optical--far-infrared [O III] and low-ionization optical diagnostics. Additional optical and ultraviolet diagnostics show that inferred densities can span several orders of magnitude within a galaxy. Representative two-zone models reproduce the [O III] 4363, 5007, and 88um emission in SBS0335-052E and Haro11 by combining relatively dense gas with cooler, low-density gas. The low-density component contributes approximately 61% and 72% of the 88um luminosity, but only 14% and 23% of the 5007 luminosity, respectively. These solutions are not unique and may represent a broader unresolved distribution of gas conditions. Our results show that temperatures and densities inferred from integrated one-zone analyses are effective quantities and that similar diagnostic discrepancies can arise in nearby metal-poor galaxies.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.