Multi-Algorithm Hierarchical Minimum Data Sets for Soil Quality Assessment in the Black Soil Region of Northeast China: A Case Study in Keshan County

Résumé fourni par la source

The Northeast black soil region is a major grain-producing area in China, where county-scale assessment of topsoil quality is essential for soil conservation and provides a potential indicator framework for regional soil quality monitoring. In this study, 500 composite cultivated-layer samples were collected from dryland croplands in Keshan County, Heilongjiang Province. Soil physical properties, basic chemical properties, and macro-, secondary, and micronutrient contents were measured to establish a total data set (TDS). Three hierarchical total data sets (TDS1, TDS2, and TDS3) were established from the original TDS according to the progressive incorporation of soil physical properties, basic chemical properties, macronutrients, secondary nutrients, and micronutrients. Within each hierarchical TDS, key indicators were selected using random forest (RF), mutual information (MI), principal component analysis (PCA), and minimum spanning tree (Tree) methods to construct algorithm-specific minimum data sets (MDSs). TDS1 included soil physical properties, basic chemical properties, and macronutrients; TDS2 further incorporated secondary nutrients; and TDS3 additionally included micronutrients to represent progressively comprehensive soil nutrient information. The soils exhibited considerable soil organic matter and cation exchange capacity, with mean values of 51.45 g kg−1 and 34.85 cmolc kg−1, respectively, and a mean pH of 6.04. Across the four algorithms, commonly retained indicators included SOM, TN, pH, CEC, and Silt, while nutrient-related indicators such as AP, AK, S, Zn, and Fe were additionally selected under different hierarchical MDSs, reflecting the importance of multi-nutrient information in soil quality characterization. Available phosphorus, available potassium, sulfur, and zinc showed greater spatial variability than basic physicochemical properties. The four algorithms differed in indicator selection, reflecting their distinct sensitivities to linear variation, information gain, multilevel contributions, and network structure. RF_MDS1 showed the highest agreement with the TDS (R2 = 0.924), indicating its strong capability in preserving overall soil quality information using a simplified indicator set. RF_MDS3 maintained a high consistency with the TDS (R2 = 0.836) while incorporating additional secondary nutrients and micronutrients. Therefore, RF_MDS3 was considered a more comprehensive MDS framework when multi-nutrient representation and potential nutrient constraint identification were prioritized, whereas RF_MDS1 remained an efficient option for simplified soil quality assessment. This framework may provide a transferable approach for soil quality assessment and nutrient management in comparable black-soil regions and dryland farming systems.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.