Prediction of Atrial Fibrillation Occurrence With Handheld Mobile Electrocardiogram: Deep Learning Model Development Using Real-World Data

Le résumé fourni par la source

Abstract Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common arrhythmia associated with an increased risk of stroke and heart failure. To improve prevention, recent studies have used deep learning models to identify at-risk individuals early from normal sinus rhythm (NSR). However, studies using mobile electrocardiogram (mECG) in outpatient, real-world settings remain underexplored. Objective The study aimed to develop and evaluate deep learning models using a real-world limb-lead mECG database to predict the short-term occurrence of AF from NSR recordings. Methods mECG data were collected from real-world users of commercially available handheld mECG devices capable of capturing 6 limb leads. AF occurrence was defined as an AF event within a predefined time window (7, 14, or 31 d) from the date of the NSR recording. Transformer-based prediction models were developed for limb-lead and lead I input configurations using a multistage training approach with self-supervised pretraining and domain adaptation, drawing on both open, large-scale clinical 12-lead ECG and proprietary real-world mECG databases. The models were evaluated in an internal real-world cohort and explored in an external cohort as a proof of concept via time-to-event analysis. Results Between March 2023 and November 2024, 386,519 mECGs were acquired from 8206 users. There were 18,949, 25,206, and 33,524 AF incidences within the 7-, 14-, and 31-day time windows. The models were pretrained with 787,257 12-lead ECGs and 202,689 mECGs, then fine-tuned to predict AF occurrence using 97,447 labeled mECGs. The limb-lead models achieved areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCs) of 0.793, 0.785, and 0.787 for 7-, 14-, and 31-day predictions on the internal cohort, respectively, with a user-level AUROC of 0.702 for the 31-day prediction. These models significantly outperformed the lead I models ( P <.001), supporting the value of multilead configurations. The multistage pretraining was essential, as single-source pretraining yielded lower AUROCs of 0.555 with mECGs only and 0.761 with 12-lead ECGs only for the 31-day prediction. In the subgroup analysis, AUROC values were consistent across age, PR interval, and corrected QT interval, but showed disparities ( P <.001) by sex (0.713 in females vs 0.794 in males) and by QRS duration (0.583 in ≥120 ms vs 0.796 in <120 ms). In the external cohort (n=144), the 31-day model stratified all 5 new-onset AF events, showing significantly different survival functions between the positively and negatively predicted groups ( P =.03); Cox proportional hazards regression yielded a hazard ratio of 1.49 (95% CI 1.06‐2.09) per 0.1 increase in model output. Conclusions Our findings elucidate the feasibility of deep learning–based AF risk prediction using single-NSR recordings from mobile devices, highlighting the potential for remote AF management in real-world populations. The model output may serve as a risk indicator to support opportunistic AF screening, prompting further clinical evaluation and informing decisions about more intensive monitoring.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.