Interpretable machine learning for hikikomori screening: The adaptive HRI-15
Rattachement africain : it. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Hikikomori, or prolonged social withdrawal, is an issue of global relevance. The HRI-15 is a brief tool for its assessment. This study enhances its utility by adding clinical thresholds to identify risk and person-centered clinical profiles, and by developing a machine-learning(ML)-based computerized adaptive test (CAT) to enable rapid screening. Data from a national survey of Italian adolescents (N = 8,755) were used to conduct ROC analysis and latent profile analysis (LPA). The findings indicated that a score of ≥ 42 achieved optimal classification performance, and four profiles with distinct meanings and systematic differences in anxiety, depression, impulsivity, and risk behaviors were identified. A multivariate conditional inference tree was estimated to develop an ML-based adaptive version of the instrument. The CAT reduced administered items by 53% (7.03/15), accurately reproducing full-length scores (r = .77-.997) and the corresponding classification; alignment was assessed with latent transition analysis (entropy = .96). The procedure was integrated into an application supporting administration, scoring, and reporting (score, risk, profiles, graphs). Combining a cross-validated cutoff and clinically useful profiles with CAT and its automated administration and reporting application strengthens triage and personalization, enabling large-scale, multidomain screening and earlier intervention for hikikomori risk.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Interpretable machine learning for hikikomori screening: The adaptive HRI-15
- Date Crossref
- 20/08/2026
- Éditeur
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.