Trace Element Content and U-Pb Geochronology of Detrital Rutile in the Cretaceous-to-Eocene Julian and Brkini Flysch Basins (SE Alps and NW Dinarides, Italy and Slovenia)
Rattachement africain : it, ch. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
The Cretaceous-to-Eocene Julian (JB) and Brkini (BK) flysch basins have recently been studied for their heavy mineral assemblages; however, the rutile component has so far been neglected. To fill this gap, this study explores their detrital rutile trace element contents and U-Pb ages to define their possible provenance(s). In JB, there are very few rutile grains, mainly related to amphibolite–eclogite facies metamorphic units, with about 80% metapelitic grains. Among the few rutile grains from JB, only eight gave robust U-Pb ages. These ages are all Palaeozoic, resembling those of the closure/opening of the Rheic Ocean and the Variscan orogeny. In BK, the number of rutile grains is much higher than in JB, testifying to differences in the supply areas. The rutile grains are mainly in the amphibolite–eclogite facies, but they decrease, moving upward, accompanied by an increase in UHT. The metapelitic rutile component is higher than 74%. When considering the BK rutile grains, there are no Palaeozoic ages at the bottom of the sequence, while they are newly visible upward. In BK, the most abundant rutile grains show Mesozoic ages that can be considered as representatives of the opening/closure of the Vardar Ocean and the ophiolite emplacement in the Dinarides area.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Trace Element Content and U-Pb Geochronology of Detrital Rutile in the Cretaceous-to-Eocene Julian and Brkini Flysch Basins (SE Alps and NW Dinarides, Italy and Slovenia)
- Date Crossref
- 20/08/2026
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.