Distinguishing Acute Myocardial Infarction from Other Forms of Cardiac Injury with the Cardiac Troponin Long-T ITC Complex and High-Sensitivity Troponin I and T in Patients with Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome: MERITnI Substudy

Le résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND: We determined whether circulating cardiac troponin I-cardiac troponin T-troponin C (ITC) complex containing long-form cardiac troponin T (long-T ITC) complex and ratios of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) could differentiate myocardial infarction (MI) from chronic and acute non-MI myocardial injuries in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome. METHODS: We measured long-T ITC complex, hs-cTnI, and hs-cTnT (Mindray) at 0- and 2-h in consecutive patients enrolled in the Mindray hs-cTnI Assay Analytical and Clinical Evaluation for the Diagnosis and RIsk Assessment of Myocardial InfarctIon (MERITnI) trial. RESULTS: Among the 882 subjects studied (median 3.0 h presentation), 47 had acute MI (5.3%), 116 had acute non-MI myocardial injury, and 90 had chronic myocardial injury. At 0 and 2 h, areas under the curve (AUC) significantly differentiated acute MI from chronic myocardial injury for long-T ITC complex (0.72 and 0.81, respectively; P = 0.0082) but not acute non-MI myocardial injury (AUC, 0.65 and 0.69, respectively; P = 0.23). 0 and 2 h AUCs for long-T ITC complex/hs-cTnT and hs-cTnI/hs-cTnT ratios also significantly differentiated acute MI from chronic myocardial injury (AUC, 0.79 and 0.86, respectively) and acute non-MI myocardial injury (AUC, 0.68 and 0.71, respectively). There was no biomarker concentration or ratio value discrimination between type 1 and type 2 MIs. CONCLUSIONS: Long-T ITC concentrations and long-T ITC complex/hs-cTnT and hs-cTnI/hs-cTnT ratios may clinically assist in differentiating acute MI from non-MI myocardial injuries when evaluating patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome. ClinicalTrials.gov Registration Number: NCT05853042.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.