Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 article

Comparing niraparib versus platinum-taxane doublet chemotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment in patients with newly diagnosed homologous recombination–deficient stage III/IV ovarian cancer: Findings from cohort C of the OPAL phase 2 trial

0Citations signalées — pas une note de qualité
19Institutions déclarées
4Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND: Despite therapeutic improvements in advanced ovarian cancer (aOC), prognosis remains poor for patients with residual disease after cytoreductive surgery. Reported here are results from cohort C of the phase 1b/2 OPAL study of a neoadjuvant poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor for aOC. METHODS: Eligible adults with newly diagnosed stage III/IV homologous recombination-deficient (HRd) aOC and measurable disease per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 were randomized 1:1 to receive neoadjuvant platinum-taxane chemotherapy (platinum-taxane) or niraparib. During the prescreening period, patients received 1 run-in cycle of carboplatin-paclitaxel. After neoadjuvant therapy, patients with an unconfirmed complete/partial response (CR/PR) or stable disease per RECIST could undergo interval debulking surgery (IDS), followed by adjuvant platinum-taxane-based chemotherapy. After adjuvant therapy, patients without progression received niraparib-based maintenance treatment. Primary endpoint was pre-IDS unconfirmed investigator-assessed overall response rate (ORR) per RECIST. Secondary endpoints included safety. RESULTS: Of 36 patients randomized, 19 received niraparib and 17, platinum-taxane. Baseline demographics and characteristics were similar between arms. Overall, the pre-IDS unconfirmed ORR was 31.6% (CR/PR, 0/31.6%) with niraparib and 70.6% (CR/PR, 0/70.6%) with platinum-taxane. The pre-IDS unconfirmed ORR (80% CI) difference was -39.0% (-56.8% to -17.7%), favoring platinum-taxane. The trial was closed early for futility. Grade ≥3 adverse-event rates during the neoadjuvant period were 42% and 59% in the niraparib and platinum-taxane arms, respectively. No fatal serious adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: In newly diagnosed HRd aOC, neoadjuvant niraparib did not improve ORR versus standard platinum-based chemotherapy, and the trial was discontinued. The safety profile was consistent with those of previous PARP inhibitor studies.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Comparing niraparib versus platinum-taxane doublet chemotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment in patients with newly diagnosed homologous recombination–deficient stage III/IV ovarian cancer: Findings from cohort C of the OPAL phase 2 trial
Date Crossref
01/09/2026
Éditeur
Elsevier BV
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Sujets associés

PARP inhibition in cancer therapyOvarian cancer diagnosis and treatmentReproductive Biology and Fertility

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Recherche à la demande dans Crossref et Europe PMC, sans clé ; OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant requis, aucune réponse conservée. Sources et limites.