Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 article

Current Messaging Used for Antimicrobial Resistance in Public Awareness Campaigns: A Scoping Review

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
2Institutions déclarées
2Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : Afrique du Sud, gb. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Bacterial Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) is a global health threat. The lack of a universal communication strategy remains a limitation in public awareness campaigns related to antibiotic use and AMR. We reviewed the published evidence on current messaging used in public awareness campaigns between 2000 and 2024. Of the 42 studies included, 21 campaigns were reported from European countries compared to one campaign from an African country. Educational campaigns were the most common type reported (57%). Whilst multifaceted approaches were used, print material was the most common communication medium. The three key messaging themes were communicating AMR risks, AMR solutions, and antibiotic use. Sub-themes included inappropriate antibiotic use, self-care, and ineffectiveness of antibiotics against viral infections. In campaigns that included tailored messaging, parenting roles, age, and susceptibility to respiratory infections were strong determinants of targeted behaviors. Risk communication was used in 36% of studies, including focusing on the dangers of AMR to public health and preventative actions such as hand hygiene. Positive outcomes were reported in 69% of the studies. Sociocultural factors were not considered in the design and delivery of messages, yet differences in AMR knowledge, attitudes and behaviors were observed across sociodemographic indices such as literacy, age, and gender of the target population. Whilst consistent messaging in AMR public awareness is being reported, current campaigns fail to use context-specific communication. To our knowledge, these findings are the first to highlight the need for targeted public messages that are sociocultural and context-specific in promoting sustainable action.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Current Messaging Used for Antimicrobial Resistance in Public Awareness Campaigns: A Scoping Review
Date Crossref
20/08/2026
Éditeur
Informa UK Limited
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Où se fait cette recherche

  • University of Cape Town University of Cape Town, Afrique du Sud (code pays fourni par la source)
    Université ou école supérieure
  • University of Liverpool pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • Eh!woza pays non établi dans la notice
    Institution

University of Cape Town (University of Cape Town, Afrique du Sud), University of Liverpool et Eh!woza. Pays d’affiliation : Afrique du Sud.

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Antibiotic Use and ResistanceVaccine Coverage and HesitancyInfection Control in Healthcare

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.