Call-taker recognition of stroke and TIA in emergency calls in Region Zealand, Denmark
Résumé fourni par la source
Rapid recognition of stroke/transient ischaemic attack (TIA) in the emergency telephone is crucial to ensure timely intervention and direct transport to stroke centres. Our study investigated the diagnostic accuracy via the 1-1-2 emergency line (1-1-2) call-takers in Region Zealand, Denmark, and examined whether recognised cases had a higher chance of referral to a primary stroke centre and receiving thrombolysis. We retrospectively analysed calls linked to hospital discharge codes for stroke/TIA. Call-taker stroke/TIA suspicion was documented. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated. Additionally, we calculated the relative risk of receiving intravenous thrombolysis and direct stroke-centre transport for recognised versus unrecognised calls. Among 196,235 calls to 1-1-2 from 2021 to 2024, 2581 patients had confirmed stroke/TIA. Dispatcher sensitivity was 0.75, with a PPV of 0.18. Recognised patients compared to unrecognised cases had a higher chance of direct admissions to primary stroke units with a RR of 1.46 (95% CI = 1.38;1.54) and a higher chance of receiving thrombolysis with a RR of 1.43 (95% CI = 1.12;1.82). Correct call-taker recognition of stroke/TIA was significantly associated with improved acute management, chance of thrombolysis and correct hospital pathway. A substantial proportion of stroke cases remain unrecognised. Enhanced decision-support tools could potentially improve call-taker performance and patient outcomes in Region Zealand.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Call-taker recognition of stroke and TIA in emergency calls in Region Zealand, Denmark
- Date Crossref
- 19/08/2026
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.