Efficient rigorous stress field calculations for machine learning interatomic potentials
Résumé fourni par la source
The computation of atomistic stress fields plays a central role in linking atomistic simulations to continuum models. However, commonly used stress measures, such as the per-atom virial stress, do not constitute true spatial stress fields consistent with the continuum balance laws. Moreover, when constructing continuum-consistent atomistic stress fields, fundamental non-uniqueness arises from the decomposition of atomic forces into interatomic contributions. While physically motivated force decompositions are often available for conventional physics-based interatomic potentials, these approaches become problematic for modern machine-learning potentials that are formulated in terms of high-dimensional, data-driven descriptors rather than explicit interatomic distances. In this work, we develop a computationally efficient projection-based force decomposition framework that enables the construction of smooth and continuous atomistic stress fields for both conventional and machine-learning interatomic potentials. We show that the proposed method avoids reliance on distance-based chain-rule formulations and remains robust to model representation choices. Validation across a variety of interatomic potentials for diamond-cubic silicon demonstrates that the resulting stress fields exhibit significantly reduced noise. Our method establishes a consistent and reliable basis for stress field computation and interpretation in simulations employing machine-learning interatomic potentials.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Efficient rigorous stress field calculations for machine learning interatomic potentials
- Date Crossref
- 02/09/2026
- Éditeur
- IOP Publishing
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.