Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 article

Detecting swine influenza A virus during fattening and at slaughter: implications for monitoring strategies in fattening herds

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
2Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : de. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND: Swine influenza A virus (swIAV) is a major contributor to respiratory disease in pigs and represents a One-Health concern. This study evaluated whether slaughterhouse sampling can complement or partially substitute on-farm monitoring by comparing slaughterhouse-derived sample specimens for swIAV detection and subtype characterization. RESULTS: Twenty-one pig farms in Germany were enrolled, and one batch of fatteners per farm was monitored longitudinally using pen-based oral fluids (OFs) at three predefined time points during fattening. In case of acute respiratory distress, tracheobronchial swabs (TBS) were collected from 15 affected pigs. At slaughter, 30 pigs per farm were sampled and tested for swIAV by qPCR, yielding OFs, nasal swabs before and after scalding (NS I/NS II), bronchial swabs (BS), lung tissue (LT), and serum. Overall, 18/21 farms (85.7%) were classified as swIAV-positive, with a seroprevalence of 92.4% in the study population. During fattening, swIAV-RNA was detected in OFs collected on-farm in 7/21 farms (33.3%) at least once, most frequently at the beginning of fattening. Among 15 farms with TBS sampling, swIAV-RNA was detected in 4 farms (26.7%). At slaughter, swIAV-RNA was detected in at least one matrix on 7/21 farms and in 74/540 pigs (13.7%). Detection probability at slaughter differed by specimen: lower respiratory tract samples showed higher detection rates and lower Ct-values than NS (BS: 9.7%, LT: 10.9%; NS: 6.3%). Diagnostic agreement between materials ranged from fair to moderate, highest between BS and LT (κ = 0.58; p < 0.001). Slaughterhouse OFs showed low sensitivity. From selected RT-qPCR-positive samples with Ct < 33, BS yielded the highest proportion of successfully subtyped samples. Subtypes HA-1 C.2.1 (H1avN1EA), HA-1 C.2.4 (H1avN2G), and HA-1B.1 (H1huN2G) were identified in 4/7 RT-qPCR-positive farms. CONCLUSION: Despite longitudinal OF sampling during fattening and additional TBS collection during acute respiratory disease, swIAV-RNA was only detected in a subset of seropositive farms. Molecular detection at slaughter was likewise restricted, whereas serology substantially improved herd-level identification. Among PCR-based sample types in slaughter pigs, BS demonstrated the highest diagnostic yield and suitability for subtype characterization. Even combined, on-farm and slaughterhouse RT-qPCR approaches remained constrained by the transient nature of swIAV shedding. Slaughterhouse sampling therefore complements-but does not replace-structured on-farm investigations for comprehensive surveillance.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Detecting swine influenza A virus during fattening and at slaughter: implications for monitoring strategies in fattening herds
Date Crossref
19/08/2026
Éditeur
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Où se fait cette recherche

  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut pays non établi dans la notice
    Organisme public
  • Clinic for Swine pays non établi dans la notice
    Établissement de santé
  • Institute for Infectious Diseases and Zoonoses Division of Virology pays non établi dans la notice
    Structure de recherche
  • Institute of Diagnostic Virology pays non établi dans la notice
    Structure de recherche
  • CEVA Tiergesundheit pays non établi dans la notice
    Institution

Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut et Clinic for Swine, avec 3 autres affiliations.

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Influenza Virus Research StudiesRespiratory viral infections researchAnimal Virus Infections Studies

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.