Predictors of the use of psycho-oncological care
Rattachement africain : de. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
PURPOSE: Psychosocial stressors and mental disorders can negatively affect the success of cancer treatments. Therefore, they should be addressed by target group-oriented psycho-oncological care. This study examined possible predictors of the use of psycho-oncological care. METHODS: Routine data from 5217 patients of a German Comprehensive Cancer Center between 2020 and 2023 were analysed in a retrospective monocentric study. The effects of predictors (gender, age, distance to the center, subjective stress at intake, and tumor stage) on the use of psycho-oncological care (use vs. no use) and on the number of psycho-oncological care sessions lasting at least 20 min were explored using logistic and binomial regression analyses. RESULTS: Women at younger age, experiencing subjective distress, and patients with advanced-stage cancer were significantly more likely to use psycho-oncological support. Female patients, younger patients, patients who lived closer to the treating centre, patients with subjective distress, and patients at higher tumor stages attended more sessions of psycho-oncological counselling. The analyses also indicated substantial differences between different organ-specific cancer centers. CONCLUSION: All patients should be screened for psychological distress and wish for psycho-oncological support by a structured and validated tool. Vulnerable patients, patients at risk, and those, who are hesitant to seek help, could be screened by an interview to reduce barriers.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Predictors of the use of psycho-oncological care
- Date Crossref
- 19/08/2026
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.