Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 article

Lumbar Belt for Nonspecific Low Back Pain

0Citations signalées — pas une note de qualité
22Institutions déclarées
2Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Résumé fourni par la source

Importance: Nonspecific low back pain is highly prevalent and disabling. Most current guidelines state that evidence is insufficient to recommend lumbar belts for this condition. Objective: To determine whether a soft and extensible lumbar belt reduces functional disability and pain in patients with nonspecific low back pain. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter, open-label, randomized clinical trial was conducted at 17 medical centers across France from February 26, 2021, to March 28, 2024. Participants were adults with nonspecific low back pain lasting 1 to 6 months. Data were analyzed from August 7, 2024, to June 18, 2025. Interventions: Patients were randomized using an interactive web response system to wear a nonrigid lumbar belt for 12 weeks in addition to usual care or to receive usual care without a device. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the between-group difference in mean change in the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score from baseline to week 12. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, week 4, and week 12; pain was also reported weekly using online questionnaires. Results: At total of 168 patients were randomized (mean [SD] age, 49.0 [13.7] years; 101 women [60.1%]), with 86 participants in the belt group and 82 participants in the usual care group. The primary analysis included 155 patients with at least 1 postrandomization assessment (81 patients in the belt group; 74 patients in the control group). ODI improvement from baseline to week 12 was greater in the belt group (change, -10.0 [95% CI, -13.0 to -7.0] points) than in the control group (change, -5.3 [95% CI, -8.6 to -2.1] points), with a between-group difference of -4.7 (95% CI, -8.4 to -0.9) points (P = .01). Reductions in pain at rest and during activity were also greater in the belt group, with between-group differences of -8.7 (95% CI, -16.1 to -1.3) points (P = .02) and -10.0 (95% CI, -18.3 to -1.6) points (P = .02), respectively. Over 12 weeks, medication use was lower in the belt group than in the control group (41 patients [50.6%] vs 50 patients [67.6%]; P = .03). No serious device-related adverse events occurred. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, adding a nonrigid lumbar belt to usual care resulted in improved pain and functional disability in patients with nonspecific low back pain lasting 1 to 6 months. These findings suggest that lumbar belts may be considered as a nonpharmacological option for symptom management. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04701073.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Lumbar Belt for Nonspecific Low Back Pain
Date Crossref
19/08/2026
Éditeur
American Medical Association (AMA)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Sujets associés

Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationSpine and Intervertebral Disc PathologyMedical Imaging and Analysis

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Recherche à la demande dans Crossref et Europe PMC, sans clé ; OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant requis, aucune réponse conservée. Sources et limites.