Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 article

Ventricular Pulsed Field Ablation from Bench to Bedside: Preclinical and Clinical Evidence from a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

0Citations signalées — pas une note de qualité
12Institutions déclarées
2Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Evidence supporting the use of pulsed field ablation (PFA) for ventricular arrhythmia (VA) ablation remains limited and heterogeneous, and the relationship between preclinical lesion characteristics and clinical outcomes is incompletely defined. We sought to systematically summarize preclinical lesion metrics and clinical outcomes of ventricular PFA. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical and clinical studies of ventricular PFA. Preclinical studies reporting lesion depth or transmurality and clinical studies detailing procedural efficacy and safety were included. Random-effects models were used to pool lesion characteristics and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Seventy-five studies were included (33 preclinical, 43 clinical; 355 patients). In preclinical models, mean lesion depth was 5.96mm(95%CI,5.07-6.84) in healthy endocardium and 5.19mm (95%CI,2.58-7.79) in healthy epicardium. Notably, lesion depth was quantitatively similar in models of scarred myocardium (5.96mm; 95%CI,5.39-6.53). Lesion transmurality was variable in healthy tissues (32%; 95%CI,15%-52%) but higher within scar (53%; 95%CI,36%-70%). Consistently, lesion depth was similar between PFA and RF in healthy myocardium, but greater with PFA in scarred models (within-study mean depth difference, 2.09mm; 95%CI,0.84-3.34). Greater contact force, repeated applications, and higher energy/duration settings were associated with increased lesion depth. Clinically, acute success was high for both premature ventricular complexes (PVCs,90%; 95%CI,83%-96%) and ventricular tachycardia (VT;92%; 95%CI,87%-96%) in studies with ≥3patients. Over a mean follow-up of approximately 5months, recurrence rates were 19% (95%CI,12%-28%) for PVCs and 21% (95%CI,10%-35%) for VT. The overall complication rate was 10% (95%CI,5%-17%) in studies with ≥3patients, with coronary artery spasm and conduction disturbances representing the most frequent adverse events. CONCLUSION: Ventricular PFA demonstrates high acute efficacy and encouraging mid-term outcomes, supported by preclinical evidence of favorable lesion penetration within scarred myocardium. Safety considerations-particularly coronary and conduction system effects-and the heterogeneity of preclinical evidence highlight the need for further investigation.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Ventricular Pulsed Field Ablation from Bench to Bedside: Preclinical and Clinical Evidence from a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Date Crossref
19/08/2026
Éditeur
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Sujets associés

Cardiac Arrhythmias and TreatmentsAtrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesUltrasound and Hyperthermia Applications

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Recherche à la demande dans Crossref et Europe PMC, sans clé ; OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant requis, aucune réponse conservée. Sources et limites.