The Influence of Individual-Based and Community-Based Learning on Self-Compassionate Attitudes and Behaviors
Résumé fourni par la source
This study focused on 3 aspects of a virtual learning program on self-compassion: (1) changes in attitude and behavior at 3 time points: course initiation, course completion, and 6 weeks postcompletion, (2) differences between 2 formats: individual learning versus community learning, and (3) impact of 6 self-help tools. Eighty-eight randomly assigned participants were assigned to either an individual-learning group (ILG) or a community-learning group (CLG). Identical course information and materials were used in both groups; the difference was that the individual group privately watched the weekly video and had access to online interaction with each other, while the CLG watched the weekly video collectively on zoom followed by a live small-group interactive discussion. The results indicate that the course significantly improved attitude scores; the improvements occurred immediately at the completion of the course and were not temporary. Behavior scores also improved in both groups; however, participants within the CLG showed more behavioral improvement than participants in the ILG. Interestingly, the CLG rated the small-group interactive discussion as the most impactful tool, while the ILG rated the online interactive chat as the least impactful tool. These findings have relevance to both personal growth and well-being, as well as professional growth and employee wellness.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- The Influence of Individual-Based and Community-Based Learning on Self-Compassionate Attitudes and Behaviors
- Date Crossref
- 18/08/2026
- Éditeur
- Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.