Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 article

IN.PACT AV Access randomized trial update: 3-year clinical results by anatomic and demographic subsets and 5-year extension mortality analysis

0Citations signalées — pas une note de qualité
7Institutions déclarées
4Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Résumé fourni par la source

PURPOSE: To report 36-month outcomes by anatomic and demographic subsets, and mortality through 60 months from the IN.PACT AV Access Study, a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial of a paclitaxel drug-coated balloon (DCB) versus percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) for dysfunctional hemodialysis arteriovenous fistulas (AVF). METHODS: The IN.PACT AV Access Study enrolled 330 participants at 29 international sites and randomized 1:1 to DCB (n = 170) or PTA (n = 160). Target lesion primary patency (TLPP) outcomes through 36 months were stratified by core laboratory-adjudicated anatomic subsets: lesion types (de novo and restenotic), AVF type (radiocephalic and brachiocephalic/ brachiobasilic), and lesion locations (peri-anastomotic, cephalic arch, and venous outflow). TLPP outcomes were also stratified by participant demographics. Mortality rates were reported through 60 months. RESULTS: Through 36 months, DCB showed numerically or statistically greater TLPP compared to PTA in de novo (50.6% versus 42.2%, p = 0.175) and restenotic (40.5% versus 22.7%, p < 0.001) lesions. Similarly, 36-month TLPP was significantly better for DCB compared to PTA in radiocephalic (44.5% versus 33.8%, p = 0.039) and brachiocephalic/ brachiobasilic (39.9% versus 21.3%, p = 0.011) AVFs. In lesion location subsets, 36-month TLPP was numerically greater with DCB versus PTA: peri-anastomotic (40.4% versus 31.1%, p = 0.047), cephalic arch (40.9% versus 27.9%, p = 0.079), and venous outflow (45.6% versus 25.5%, p = 0.048). Through 36 months, TLPP favored DCB treatment over PTA across race and sex. After incorporating additional vital status information, sixty-month freedom from all-cause mortality was 59.0% DCB versus 53.5% PTA (p = 0.510). CONCLUSION: Results showed sustained TLPP benefit for DCB compared to PTA in all subset analyses through 36 months and no mortality signal for DCB through 5 years. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03041467 . Registered 01 February 2017. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 1b, Randomized controlled trial.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
IN.PACT AV Access randomized trial update: 3-year clinical results by anatomic and demographic subsets and 5-year extension mortality analysis
Date Crossref
19/08/2026
Éditeur
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Sujets associés

Central Venous Catheters and HemodialysisVascular Procedures and ComplicationsDiagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Recherche à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé ; OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant requis, aucune donnée externe enregistrée en base. Sources et limites.