Domain-specific physical activity levels and risk of dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Le résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND: Associations between physical activity and distinct health outcomes vary by domain (eg, leisure-time, occupational, household, or commuting); however, comparable evidence on dementia risk remains scarce. We aimed to examine the associations between domain-specific physical activity and risk of all-cause dementia, Alzheimer's disease, and vascular dementia. METHODS: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we systematically searched PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, PsycINFO, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science for cohort and case-control studies published between Jan 1, 2021, and May 2, 2026. We also included studies from a previous systematic review (from database inception to Oct 21, 2021) with the same search strategy and eligibility criteria. Eligible studies included adults aged 20 years or older with cognitive function assessed at baseline, physical activity measures, and at least 1 year of follow-up. Studies were appraised with the Rayyan web-based platform and summary data (relative risk [RR] and 95% CI) were extracted by up to six independent reviewers. Outcomes were all-cause dementia, Alzheimer's disease, and vascular dementia, analysed by multilevel random-effects meta-analyses. Study quality was assessed with an adapted scale. This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD420251010899). FINDINGS: =0·0%) physical activity were associated with an increased risk. Dose-response meta-analyses showed non-linear inverse associations for leisure-time and occupational activity. Certainty of evidence ranged from very low to low across domains. INTERPRETATION: The association between physical activity and dementia risk might be domain-specific. Public health strategies for the prevention of dementia should address equitable access to safe spaces for exercise, adequate leisure time, and mitigation strategies in occupational settings. FUNDING: US National Institutes of Health, Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul; the Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development; and Department of Science and Technology of Secretariat of Science, Technology, Innovation and Health Complex of Ministry of Health of Brazil.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.