Association Between Vitamin D and Muscle Mass and Function in Children and Adolescents
Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the association between vitamin D and muscle health in children and adolescents. DESIGN: A cross-sectional analysis was performed using data from 2,775 participants aged 8-17 years in NHANES 2011-2014. Muscle mass was evaluated through whole-body and regional muscle-to-fat ratios (MFRs), while muscle function was assessed using relative handgrip strength (RHGS). Vitamin D status was characterized by serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D), 25(OH)D3, 25(OH)D2 levels, and 25(OH)D categorized as deficient, insufficient, or sufficient. The analysis employed covariate-adjusted linear regression and restricted cubic splines (RCS), with predictive ability of RHGS assessed via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. RESULTS: Significant positive associations between total 25(OH)D levels and muscle-related parameters were observed across adjusted models. Associations varied across sex and age groups, and RHGS demonstrated limited predictive value for vitamin D status across all subgroups (maximum AUC = 0.635). CONCLUSIONS: Total 25(OH)D appeared to be the most informative indicator of vitamin D status in relation to pediatric muscle health, although associations varied to sex, age, and assessment measures. RHGS demonstrated limited utility as a screening indicator for vitamin D insufficiency or deficiency status.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Association Between Vitamin D and Muscle Mass and Function in Children and Adolescents
- Date Crossref
- 18/08/2026
- Éditeur
- Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.