Maribavir in lung transplant recipients with cytomegalovirus infection: real-life experience
Résumé fourni par la source
INTRODUCTION: Cytomegalovirus remains a major challenge in LTx recipients. Despite advances in antiviral therapy, refractory and resistant CMV infections persist, and real-world data on maribavir, a recently approved UL97 kinase inhibitor, are limited. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 49 LTx recipients treated with maribavir for refractory and resistant (R/R) CMV between August 2022 and December 2024. RESULTS: Overall, 34 patients (69.4%) achieved a sustained virological response, defined as complete CMV DNA clearance, with a > 1 log₁₀ viral load decline after a median of 11.5 days and complete viral clearance after a median of 24.8 [7-54] days. Sixteen patients (32.7%) failed therapy; UL97 resistance mutations were detected during maribavir therapy in 14 patients (28.6%). Non-responders had higher baseline viral loads (> 10,000 IU/ml: 53.3% vs. 20.6%; p = 0.047) and slower viral decline (14 (6-85) vs. 10.5 (2-27) days; p = 0.033). In multivariable analysis, higher baseline CMV viral load was independently associated with maribavir resistance (OR 3.729 per log₁₀ increase, 95% CI 1.360-10.226; p = 0.011). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, maribavir represents an important therapeutic option for R/R CMV after lung transplantation. However, treatment failure, relapse, and resistance remained common, highlighting the need for careful monitoring and further optimization of treatment strategies.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Maribavir in lung transplant recipients with cytomegalovirus infection: real-life experience
- Date Crossref
- 18/08/2026
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.