Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 article

Radiobiological and Treatment Planning Evidence Supporting Particle Therapy in Aggressive Breast Cancer

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
10Institutions déclarées
2Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : it, de. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Purpose Breast cancer (BC) remains the most commonly diagnosed malignancy among women worldwide with an overall 5-year-survival rate of ∼90%. The prognosis worsens dramatically for patients with metastatic and/or aggressive subtypes. In such cases, particle therapy emerges as a promising approach, offering superior tumor control while limiting the risk of secondary pathologies. Methods and Materials The radiobiological effects of X-rays were compared with those of protons (p), 4 He and 12 C ions, delivered using therapeutically-realistic Spread-Out Bragg Peaks, on 2D- and 3D-models of MDA-MB-231 (Triple-Negative (TN)) and MCF7 (ER-positive) BC cells, whereas 16 O ions were used on the MDA-MB-231 cells. To achieve relevant insights, we evaluated conventional clonogenic survival and spheroid growth dynamics, mimicking tumor architecture, on both cell lines. Cell migration and invasion, tumor‑supernatant–induced angiogenesis and the expression of pro‑angiogenic factors were systematically investigated in the TN-BC subtype to assess the potential therapeutic advantages of ion-irradiation in aggressive BC models. The here-obtained in vitro data served as input for a comparative treatment planning study with p, 4 He and 12 C ions on ten TN-BC cases. Results All ions exhibited superior efficacy compared to X-ray and effectively counteracted the X-ray-induced increase in migration and invasion. 4 He ions indicated a unique balance of advantages, showing greater relative biological effectiveness and inhibition of spheroid growth than p, and a reduction in migration and invasion comparable to 12 C ions. In the planning and NTCP study for TN-BC (α/β=9.4Gy), with similar OAR objectives (α/β=3Gy), p and 4 He ions achieved comparable CTV coverage and OARs sparing, whereas 12 C exhibited reduced coverage mainly due to this large α/β difference. Conclusions These findings suggest particle therapy as a promising strategy for aggressive BC, with p and 4 He ions demonstrating particular potential. Importantly, 4 He ions emerge as a distinctive intermediate option between protons and heavier ions, combining physical precision, biological efficacy, and clinical applicability.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Radiobiological and Treatment Planning Evidence Supporting Particle Therapy in Aggressive Breast Cancer
Date Crossref
01/08/2026
Éditeur
Elsevier BV
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Radiation Therapy and DosimetryRadiation Shielding Materials AnalysisEffects of Radiation Exposure

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.